Compare And Contrast Piagets And Bruners Theories Of Cognitive Development

Cognitive development refers to a individual ‘s idea procedures and the developemnt of mental traits.. It looks at how a individual thinks, perceives, additions understanding and together with information processing, concluding, imaginativeness and memory it is how a individual interacts with the universe from childhood through to adulthood.

This development has been measured and studied in a assortment of ways over many old ages. The widely used Intelligence Quotient ( IQ ) trials were introduced early in the twentieth century and are based on the construct of a mental age obtained from the consequences of a trial the topic undertakes. However, IQ trials have come under increasing unfavorable judgment as they merely measre a limited scope of intellectial capablenesss and definine intelligence excessively narrowly, they can besides be biased with respect to civilization, race and gender. In contrast research workers such as Watson and Skinner developed their learned theory which focused on the function of environmental factors in determining the intelligence of the kid and they argues that a kid is ductile with the ability to larn by holding behavior ‘s rewarded while others discouraged.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Piaget and Bruner were two influential theoreticians of cognitive development and both agreed that cognitive development took topographic point in phases. However, their theories are basically different.

Piaget ‘s theory was foremost published in 1952 and he was the first to suggest that there were set stairss and sequences to a child rational development and that rational development consequences from an active, dynamic interplay between a kid and her environment. His positions on head and development have been tremendously influential. His theory grew from old ages of experimental surveies of kids in their natural environment as opposed to laboratory experiments of others in the same field, although some experimental information was besides used. Piaget believed that all kids progress through four phases: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational and formal operational and a kid ‘s cognition is composed of scheme ; classs of cognition from past experience that help us to construe and understand new experiences. In Piaget ‘s position, new information is used to modify, add to, or alteration antecedently bing scheme. For illustration, a kid may hold a scheme about race. If the kid ‘s exclusive experience has been with white people, a kid might believe that all people are white. Suppose so that the kid encounters a black individual. The kid will take in this new information, modifying the antecedently bing scheme to include this new information. This adaptation by the kid consequences in a alteration that helps in two cardinal actions Piaget footings assimilation and adjustment. Assimilation is the procedure of taking in new information into our antecedently bing scheme. However, the procedure is slightly subjective as we tend to modify experience or information slightly to suit in with our preexisting beliefs. Adjustment is the altering or changing of bing scheme with the new information and new scheme developed. Using Piaget ‘s theory, cognitive development involves an on-going effort to accomplish a balance between assimilation and adjustment that he termed equilibration.

In Piaget ‘s position, so, cognitive development occurs in a series of four distinguishable phases characterized by progressively sophisticated and abstract degrees of idea. These phases ever occur in the same order, and each physiques on what was learned in the old phase. Piaget believes each phase in development occurs as a consequence of interaction between ripening and environment. He besides believes intelligence or intelligent behaviour is the ability to accommodate. Piaget ‘s theory differs from other theories in several ways: it is concerned with kids instead than all scholars, it focuses on development instead than larning per se so does non turn to acquisition of information or specific behaviors, it proposes distinct phases of development, marked by qualitative differences instead than a gradual addition in figure and complexness of behaviors, constructs, thoughts, etc.

The first sensorimotor phase occurs during the first two old ages of life. Knowledge of the universe is limited and information is chiefly obtained through centripetal inputs and motion. Babies bit by bit learn to command their ain organic structures and some linguistic communication abilities are developed. During this phase a kid achieves a sense of object stability, in other words, the cognition that objects go on bing even when they can non be seen.

The preoperational phase last from two to seven old ages. Children in the preoperational stage attempt to do sense of the universe but have a much less sophisticated manner of idea than grownups. Memory and imaginativeness are developing but by grownup criterions, is frequently unlogical and egoistic.

During the concrete operational phase from ages seven to ten a kid will get down to cover with abstract constructs while logical, rational and operational thought besides develops ( mental actions that are reversible ) . Egocentric ideas diminish. A kid will get down to understand other people ‘s positions and positions and will construct on past experiences.

Finally, the formal operational phase ( twelve to fifteen ) is where the kid develops more grownups like idea constructions and procedures. It is characterized by an increased independency for believing through jobs and state of affairss and taking determinations based on these and they will get down to ground logically, consistently and hypothetically. A formal operational kid is capable of meta-cognition, in other words, believing about thought.

One of the jobs of Piaget ‘s theory is that it ‘s been understood or taken to intend that before these ages kids are non capable ( no affair how bright ) of understanding things in certain ways. In contrast, Bruner observes that the procedure of building cognition of the universe is non done in isolation but instead within a societal context and notes that “ there is no alone sequence for all scholars, and the optimum in any peculiar instance will depend upon a assortment of factors, including past acquisition, phase of development, nature of the stuff, and single differences. ”

Bruner built on Vygotsky ‘s societal constructional theory from the 1930 ‘s which fell into three general claims ; higher mental operation in the person emerged out of societal procedures ( civilization ) , secondly, societal and psychological procedures are basically shaped by cultural tools ( linguistic communication ) and in conclusion, the developmental method Zone of Proximal Development ( ZPD ) . The ZPD is defined as the difference between problem-solving the kid is capable of executing independently, and problem-solving capablenesss with counsel or coaction. Like Piaget, Bruner said that kids have an innate capacity and that cognitive abilities develop through active interaction. Howver, unlike Piaget, Bruner argued that societal factors, peculiarly linguistic communication, were of import for cognitive growing. These underpin the construct of scaffolding ; the aid given to a kid that supports acquisition and is similar to scaffolding around a edifice, where a kid is shown how to make something so the kid can carry through the undertaking separately. The staging is a impermanent support construction which helps the kid: understand new thoughts, complete new undertakings, motivates and encourages the kid so they can accomplish higher degrees of development. In contrast to Piaget ‘s four phases, Bruner suggested three phases.

The first is the enactive manner ( first 18 months ) when the kid activities are preponderantly motor and related to motor nervousnesss. The iconic manner so develops where the kid is guided by mental imagination ; able to organize ain mental images and expresses ego on that footing. The concluding phase is the symbolic manner from about six or seven old ages onwards in which the kid will show ego in the signifier of words and will hold a mental sense of clip and distance. At this phase linguistic communication acquisition besides begins.

Bruner became interested in schooling in the USA during the 1050 ‘s with a peculiar involvement in the cognitive development of kids and the appropriate signifiers of instruction. Bruner stressed the importance of the function of societal exchanges between the kid and grownup and whilst Bruner ‘s theory is much narrower in range that Piaget ‘s, Bruner ‘s thoughts have been applied more straight to instruction. Bruner ‘s work was instrumental in the development of a scope of educational programmes and experiments in the sixtiess and he besides became involved in the design and execution of the influential MACOS undertaking which was later critiqued by others and found to be hard to implement as it required a grade of edification and acquisition on the portion of instructors, and ability, motive on the portion of pupils. Bruner was besides concerned with how cognition is represented and organised through different manners of representation and suggested that different ways of thought ( or representation ) were of import at different ages which was in contrast to Piagets who emphasised that kids developed consecutive through different phases of development.

During the 1960 ‘s Bruner besides developed his ain theory on cognitive development. In contrast to Piaget, his attack looked to environmental and experiential factors and he crisised Piaget for his deficiency of attending to societal and political context of his theory.A Bruner suggested that rational ability developed in phases through step-by-step alterations in how the head is used.

Piaget suggested that kids learnt in a set series of phases and could non larn things deemed excessively hard, nevertheless, unlike Piaget ‘s, Bruner did non postulate that these phases were needfully age-dependent, or invariant. Bruner argued that any topic can be taught efficaciously to any kid at any phase of development which underpins the thought of a coiling course of study in instruction weheby a topic is revisted repeatedly, constructing cognition and depth each clip appropriate to the degree of the kid. For illustration, it would non be appropriate to learn a three twelvemonth old complex natural philosophies, nevertheless, Bruner contented that they could be taught some rules of natural philosophies ( e.g. , force, mass, impulse, clash ) in enactive signifier and subsequently repeated in iconic, so symbolic signifier. Bruners theories on enactive, iconic, and symbolic phases may besides be applicable to grownups larning unfamiliar stuff where in contract Piaget theories relates to kids merely.

Later contemplations from Bruner on instruction in The Culture of Education ( 1996 ) demo how civilization impacts on cognitive development ; “ ‘culture shapes the head… it provides us with the toolkit by which we construct non merely our universes but our very construct of our egos and our powers ” and how his thought has changed since the 1960 ‘s.

Aswell as Piaget and Bruner, other major theoreticians such as Gesell, Erikson and Spock besides believe there are phases and periods of development, but each emphasizes a different attack to the survey of a kid ‘s thought and acquisition forms. Gesell ‘s theory is that heredity promotes development in a preordained sequence with few single differences. He deemphasizes single differences among kids and stresses the importance of ripening following an familial timetable ; abilities and accomplishments emerge in a preordained sequence. Although Erikson and Spock besides think of cognitive development in footings of phases, in contrast, they emphasize the emotional development of kids.

A

x

Hi!
I'm Kira

Would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out